Another Advance in Fast Charging, But Only Half the Story

Another Advance in Fast Charging, But Only Half the Story

A team in Ottawa recently had some success in using micro-pulsing to recharge Li-ion batteries much faster, like a full EV recharge in 5 minutes.  See this article.  That’s a big deal.  But it switches the problem from “how fast can a battery accept a charge” to “how fast can a charging station deliver power”.  There is a gold mine awaiting someone who has a good solution to that problem.  

Here’s what’s going on:  Lithium-ion batteries, at least the ones we have now, develop high resistance to incoming current during recharging.  High resistance creates heat and heat slows the charging process even more. The trick has been to pulse-charge the batteries and actively cool them to get more power in faster, using a battery management system.   The resistance recedes in the off phase, then when charging is switched back on the resistance is once again low. The Ottawa team has found a way to put in such small pulses at high power that the batteries never get into much of the high-resistance mode.  That should also mitigate the need to cool the batteries. They claim a car could get a full charge in 5-10 minutes, putting it right in the range that it takes to refuel a conventional car.  

Other teams are working on solid state batteries that don’t have this troublesome feature of resisting the incoming charge.  They are hoping to get to similar recharge times.

But that just transfers the problem to another part of the system.  We have written on this before. How must a recharge station be powered to deliver such massive amounts of power in such a short time as 5 minutes?  It’s just math. If a full charge gets you 480 miles of driving, and your EV gets 3-4 miles per kilowatt-hour of charge, you will need 120-160 kWh for a recharge.  To get that in five minutes, you would need to be able to provide power at the rate of 12 five minute intervals per hour times (120 to 160 kWh per 5 minutes) = 1.44 to 1.92 Megawatts per hour.  To keep the thickness of the wire within reason, the current would likely need to be limited to 50 amps (the more amps, the more copper in the wire would be needed). So how many volts would be needed to deliver up to 2 MW per hour at a rate of 50 amps?  Watts = Volts times Amps, ideally. So 2 million watts/50 amps = 40,000 volts. Yikes! Lots of safety systems required to prevent the average knucklehead from getting electrocuted.

More importantly, these kinds of MW-level power capacities are not found on a typical electrical distribution system and certainly not something one could put in a home.  It would require tapping into the power grid closer to a substation level where 69 kV and 115 kV lines are available to prevent the instantaneous draw from recharging putting too much of a strain on the system.  Or putting recharging stations near big solar farms. And there likely would need to be some serious capacitor banks to store up power for the bursts needed to deliver to the chargers. In other words, now a fast charging station is a serious piece of electrical gear that can have serious consequences for safety and for the grid that need to be dealt with.

Anyone out there got a better idea how to do this delivery part of the recharger system?  If so, it could be a goldmine for you because ultrafast chargers are likely to be much in demand as the charging technology continues to improve.

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gary Simon is the Chair of CleanStarts Board. A seasoned energy executive and entrepreneur with 45 years of experience in business, government, and non-profits.

CleanStart Sponsors

Weintraub | Tobin, EY, Stoel Rives, Greenberg Traurig LLP

BlueTech Valley, Buchalter, Moss Adams, PowerSoft.biz

College of Engineering & Computer Science at Sacramento State

Electric Vehicles Support Local Jobs

Electric Vehicles Support Local Jobs

The developing industry around electric cars creates jobs.  Building new manufacturing and supply chain infrastructures and investing in the new vehicle technologies by default adds jobs to the economy.  However, a legitimate question is, does Electric Vehicle(EV) adoption and use affect jobs outside of these new investments. Aggressive growth goalsia in the future adoption of EVs, will trigger a change in where households incur expenses.

In the past 5 years a host of economic papers have detailed the effect of EV adoption on national and local economies.  The findings all suggest adoption of EV can and will result in substantial job creation. Nationally an estimated 1.9 million more jobs in 2030 and a 16 times more return on changing consumer spending.  The largest job driver of local jobs with the adoption of EVs will be the spending changes as people shift from gas and oil purchases to clean electric fueling. 

 

The average gas station sells $7,000,000 of fuel per year. 

Currently, the average cost for driving a car with an internal combustion engine (ICE) car 10,000 miles a year is  $1,657.  This is money spent on gas and maintenance such as refueling and oil changes.   While these expenses help your local gas station and service center stay in business, most of the money flows out of the local economy to outside Oil Producers.  Half of the oil consumed in the US comes from overseas. As consumers shift to EVs, these expenses are repurposed. 

EV consumers will, on average, incur $522 for fueling and gain $1,135 in savings.  The two together apply $1,657 to the local economy in terms of electric energy production, retail, private services, and construction.   The savings, from owning an EV, become expenses in goods and services that, locally, create more jobs. A dollar saved from ICE vehicles and spent elsewhere is actually 16 times more job intensive.    

If California reaches Governor Brown’s goal of 1,000,000 EVs on the road by 2020, assuming savings don’t change, an additional $1.2 billion dollars will remain in the California economy.

Combine all EVs and switching to electric has contributed nearly 200,000 jobs to the California economy.  In The first half of 2019 with approximately 75,000 EVs and HEVs purchased in California, we are on pace to add another 50,000 jobs by switching to Electric Vehicles in 2010.

Looking at the evidence, the move to electric cars will help local economies.

If you want to get more involved in Electric Vehicals in Sacramento, check out Sac EV, who helped me with this report.

 

Sources”

  1.  Goleta , “Governor Brown Announces $120 million Settelment to Fund Electric Car Charging Stations Across California”, 23 March 2012, <https://www.gov.ca.gov/news.php?id=17463>
  2. Roland-Holst, David “Plug-in Electric Vehicle Deployment in California: An Economic Assessment”, September 2012
  3. Wescott and Werling, “Economic Impact of Electrification Roadmap”, Electrification Coalition, 2010
  4. “California Auto Outlook”, Auto Outlook, Inc., August 2015
  5. “Your Driving Cost”, AAA, 2018
  6. Gas/Diesel Fuel Station Revenue (2012) Gasoline (7,748 stations, selling 13,571M gallons total or 1.75M each) times $4.03 / gallon – $7M per station.
Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Thomas is the Executive Director of CleanStart. Thomas has a strong background in supporting small businesses, leadership, financial management and is proficient in working with nonprofits. He has a BS in Finance and a BA in Economics from California State University, Chico. Thomas has a passion for sustainability and a commitment to supporting non-profits in the region.

Sponsors

SMUD
CMC
RiverCity Bank

Weintraub | Tobin, Revrnt, Moss Adams, PowerSoft.biz, Greenberg Traurig

Game Changer 100 kWh charge in 5 min

Game Changer 100 kWh charge in 5 min

Two companies – Piëch and Desten – claim to have a breakthrough in ultrafast charging that would make charging an EV as simple as getting a fill-up on a regular car.  They each claim this requires no special cooling of the battery packs. This is a huge deal. Getting 100 kWh is effectively putting 300 miles range in the vehicle. But skeptics abound.  The claim is so far beyond what others have done, it naturally raises doubts. Read the full article here.

Beyond the problems of avoiding damage to the EV batteries with such a high rate of charging, there are numerous questions about where such stations could be built.  The implied rate is 1.2 MW/hour per charger, and there could be multiple charge points per site. The wire for each charger to connect to the EV shown in the rendering would carry about 50 amps, so that would mean charging at 24,000 volts.  Wow! Don’t stick your finger in that socket! To do that without taking down the grid would imply a massive on-site battery bank (unlikely since it would be the size of small multistory office building) or connecting to the transmission level of the grid, probably somewhere at 115 kV and above so it would not represent a significant fraction of the total load served by that line.  You don’t do that just anywhere. It would need to be adjacent to a substation. Not that many to choose from and not cheap to build new ones.

So, these claims raise a number of issues, but certainly push out the thinking on what might be possible as this technology advances.  Learn more about Charging at our May 30th Meetup.

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gary Simon is the Chair of CleanStarts Board. A seasoned energy executive and entrepreneur with 45 years of experience in business, government, and non-profits.

Mobility Moves Forward…

Mobility Moves Forward…

I Love My Leaf, But…

Stopping emissions is important to me.  I spent years in China watching emissions grow.. 40% of CO2 emissions  in California come from transportation and this is why I advocate that for everyone to turn to public transportation or drive a ZEV.

I do – I have a Nissan leaf and love it.  I realize buying a new EV may not be as sustainable as extending the life of old  efficient vehicles or ride sharing. Part of that is because personal vehicles sit parked most of the day, the other is because new vehicles mean an carbon intensive manufacturing process. I own a car because there are many times I need the flexibility that RT doesn’t have. (I also got a great deal from working with several EV groups in town) But now, as I have been turning to Jump Bikes and my car sits parked on Sacramento’s streets attracting Parking Officers scrutiny and risking trees falling on it. (Trees have already dropped limbs on my poor Leaf–must be some kind of revenge.)

So, I am eyeing the new entrant to the ride share market in Sacramento. Gig Cars. They are everywhere. They are a perfect example of one Startup Weekend: Sustainability Revolution’s Second Challenge: Turn a consumer product into a service.

What does this mean? And why is it green? Because it is part of the Sharing Economy, instead of each person paying for 100% of a product they use 10%, people share cost based on use. It means more people per vehicle. So coming around this year, I am going to be selling my Leaf and moving to ride share. Saving money and the environment.

In the past 2 years Sacramento is leading in lowering emissions from transportation. It started with the activity from community groups like Sac EV and companies like Clipper Creek. Then with heavy support from regional Cities, SACOG and ARB, Sacramento became the lead for investment like Electrify Americas Green Cities program. Even with all of these groups, turning Sacramento into a Clean tech hub means talking a stand personally to reduce our Carbon footprint and support local initiatives, ride RT, and participate in the discussion.

Come learn about how SMUD is reducing its transportation footprint at our MeetUp on May 30 at Uptown Studios.  If you are really motivated to make a difference join the Sustainability Revolution and participate in Startup Weekend June 21 to 23!!

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Thomas is the Executive Director of CleanStart. Thomas has a strong background in supporting small businesses, leadership, financial management and is proficient in working with nonprofits. He has a BS in Finance and a BA in Economics from California State University, Chico. Thomas has a passion for sustainability and a commitment to supporting non-profits in the region.

Sponsors

SMUD
CMC
RiverCity Bank

Weintraub | Tobin, Revrnt, Moss Adams, PowerSoft.biz, Greenberg Traurig

Highlands Power Making Waves in Clean Mobility

Highlands Power Making Waves in Clean Mobility

What is the most delicious electric motor in the world?  It could be the “pancake”. Also known as the Axial Flux Motor, it is considered the most efficient and powerful types of electric motor, but also one of the hardest to successfully build. Building an axial flux motor that is incredibly powerful as well as easily manufactured is a tall order, but Highlands Power is looking to develop just such a motor here in Sacramento.

The Axial Flux Motor Highlands is looking to produce is different from the traditional Radial flux motor in that the Magnetic Flux travels parallel to the axis of rotation as opposed to out from the center.  What does that mean for the the measurables of the motor? It means much less weight and a more compact motor (“flat as a pancake”) compared to the much heavier conventional motor. It also means more efficiency and in electric transportation, efficiency is king.

There is nothing particularly new about the idea of an axial flux, pancake motor.  What Highlands has done is to make one out of lightweight materials that can deliver surprisingly high torque, eliminating the need for a gearbox. Called the S-ONE, Highlands’ motor delivers a much better torque-to-weight ratio than current production motors. In addition, the motor is stackable, meaning if more power is needed units can be ganged together to generate as much power and torque as the vehicle needs. It is designed to be relatively low cost as well. This versatility is the cornerstone of Highlands’ plan and believes it is the key to developing more affordable electric vehicles.

The S-ONE uses an entirely new new motor layout, cooling system and manufacturing process to produce 3-4x the torque of current drivetrain motors without increasing size, weight or cost. All this performance is held in an all-composite, shock resistant housing that helps the S-ONE withstand the toughest environments on and off road. These advancements in motor technology can significantly reduce the cost of an electric vehicle and make EVs more accessible to mass market consumers.

Connor Whaley

CTO, Highlands Power

Conner Whaley, CTO of Highlands has been aggressively pursuing building this motor  for the past several years. Now, Highlands is refining the S-ONE to be ready for production and scale in the near future. At this point, more than ten automotive suppliers and OEMs are awaiting one of the 25 third-generation prototype motors to be built by Highlands for benchtop and in-vehicle testing. We look forward to hearing more as they grow and push the electiric transportation revolution forward. 

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Thomas is the Executive Director of CleanStart. Thomas has a strong background in supporting small businesses, leadership, financial management and is proficient in working with nonprofits. He has a BS in Finance and a BA in Economics from California State University, Chico. Thomas has a passion for sustainability and a commitment to supporting non-profits in the region.

Sponsors

SMUD
CMC
RiverCity Bank

Weintraub | Tobin, Revrnt, Moss Adams, PowerSoft.biz, Greenberg Traurig