Local Startup Empow Lighting among 6 to get Phase 2 CalSEED awards

Local Startup Empow Lighting among 6 to get Phase 2 CalSEED awards

Congratulations to Sergey Vasilyev and his team for a big win for Empow and its CoreGlo LED replacement product for existing fluorescent luminaires.  Empow is the first company in our region to advance to Phase 2.

Nice win! If you want more details on this product, Sergey was one of the presenters at our December 4 Connex Investor Night and we have a video of it on our Youtube Channel.  Maxout Renewables from Livermore was another winner, and we have a video of them at the same event. Other winners were Stasis Group, In-Pipe Energy, GenH and SkyCool Systems.  We hope to have some of these at our future Connex events. Watch for the announcements.

The CalSEED Press Release on the awards can be viewed here.

EPIC Symposium Highlights Directions for Future Contract Funding from CEC

EPIC Symposium Highlights Directions for Future Contract Funding from CEC

On Tuesday Feb. 19, the California Energy Commission held its annual showcase for the technologies and studies it has funded under its Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC).  EPIC raises about $160 million in funding each year and the CEC uses it to fund early startups (CalSEED), emerging technologies and creative solutions, as well as fostering energy entrepreneurs through business accelerator programs, the most well-known of which is the CleanTech Open – West.  The Symposium featured 15 panel sessions with 60 or so speakers and 35 exhibits from teams funded by EPIC.

Because many of the sessions were running concurrently, we couldn’t get to all of them, but here are some of the most interesting ideas we heard that may drive future EPIC funding solicitations and create business opportunities for you.

  • Broadening storage technologies beyond lithium ion batteries.  The recurrence of fires at large-scale lithium ion battery installations is raising concerns whether these are safe enough.  This concern is driving a look into other solutions–vanadium flow batteries, zinc-water batteries, high temp sulfur batteries, concentrated solar thermal integrated with thermal storage.  But there are more options that were not discussed–kinetic energy storage systems (flywheels), other battery chemistries–that keep the door open for more creativity in this area. One speaker offered the view that we may be just at the edge of a big price drop in storage technology driven by technology maturity and volume production, similar to what happened in solar PV, which may result in a lot more interest in storage of all types.

     

  • Non-battery solutions for matching renewables to demand.  The traditional approach to this problem has been to match supply to a variable demand, and emphasizes storage.  But what if one could turn this on its head and match demand to a variable supply through sophisticated demand management.  One speaker put it this way: “The smarter the grid, the less storage required”. Adding millions of points of control and a very smart management apps might do this.  But how much control would users be willing to surrender? How invisible could someone make it? Is there a way to simplify this approach?

     

  • Getting more from managing the charging of electric vehicles.  There must be at least three dozen entrepreneurs chasing this idea nationwide, most of which seem to be in California.  It could have larger implications for controlling load to avoid the need for storage, as noted above. How much infrastructure could be avoided if charging were better managed?   As the number of electric vehicles become dominant in California, how can complications of congestion at popular charging locations be dealt with? How can we move consumers from the mindset of “filling a tank” for a week of driving to just charging for what they immediately need? Can smaller cheaper level 2 chargers meet demand?   While there are many teams chasing this problem, there still seems room for more.

     

  • Making the energy revolution benefit underserved communities.  This topic has been receiving growing attention over the last two decades. . It seems to be as much about mobilizing underserved communities as it is about new technology. When asked projects and grant recipients acknowledged they struggled to connect with underserved groups. Promoting equitable growth was stressed in most if not all talks.  If you are looking for a demo project, the CEC is launching a tool to help you find an underserved community in which to put it and put some money behind it. They are also soliciting feedback from groups. Do you have a demo that can benefit community groups or are you a community group that has a clean tech need?
  • All of the solutions have a similar issue with adoption is they require behavior change. While we are used to energy on demand, it is not the most efficient or cost effective model. Incorporating AI that engages consumers to accommodate for future demand was identified as important for Electric Vehicle charging and Vehicle to Grid incorporation, grid management of all sizes, storage use, and building efficiency. How do we accelerate adoption faster and overcome human behavior? Do we use a stick and carrot approach, hand over energy control to AI,  or something else?

     

The CEC will be issuing new solicitations from the EPIC funding and other money it receives to advance clean fuels and alternative transportation.  If you want to get timely alerts, be sure to add your name to their notification list.

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gary Simon is the Chair of CleanStarts Board. A seasoned energy executive and entrepreneur with 45 years of experience in business, government, and non-profits.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Thomas is the Executive Director of CleanStart. Thomas has a strong background in supporting small businesses, leadership, financial management and is proficient in working with nonprofits. He has a BS in Finance and a BA in Economics from California State University, Chico. Thomas has a passion for sustainability and a commitment to supporting non-profits in the region.

Startups Encouraged after engaging with panel of active investors.

Startups Encouraged after engaging with panel of active investors.

The other night was an amazing workshop for the packed crowd at 801 K Street with incredible insights into building constructive relationships with investors.  So much was covered it is hard to do a summary that does the session justice. The discussion was particularly lively, with lots of questions from the audience.  

Matt van Leeuwen set the stage with a soup-to-nuts review of what investor are interested in during a fund raise and what terms they may seek in a Term Sheet and the final documents.  He gave a good perspective on what is negotiable–and what is not. He also warned about terms that can turn out very unfavorably for startups.

Matt discussed different types of financing options for companies, terms startups might hear,  standard terminology and special types of agreements that you might here. The Q&A led to an attendee to announce he had just been saved a great deal of time and stress in the near future.

Next from the panel lead by Chris Chediak we got to hear perspectives form a star-studded panel.  The panelists were Elizabeth Dodson, Co-founder of HomeZada, John Peters, the Board chair of the Sacramento Angels, and Roger Akers, Co-founder & Partner of Akers Capital. All of them emphasized communication with investors and industry stakeholders.  Entrepreneurs should realize good investors are there because they believe in the Company and the team. Good communication with investors helps with everything from fundraising, to growing your company, and even building a successful team — be forthright, respond quickly, answer directly, build a reputation that investors and advisors can trust.  

They discussed how much equity of options you should give up to advisers, what you can ask of investors, and the best ways to leverage those relationships. Based on the enthusiasm of the crowd, we are likely to do a second round of this workshop with new panelists and presenters.  It is a big and very important topic.

“The stronger the relationship with you and your investors is, the more you can leverage it for more opportunities.” –   Roger Akers

 

Recap: Grant Workshop Highlights New Funding Opportunities

Recap: Grant Workshop Highlights New Funding Opportunities

To date, nearly $3.4 billion has been appropriated by the Legislature to State agencies to implement Greenhouse Gas reduction programs and projects. Much of this is allocated in the form of various grants. Agencies are inviting proposals from teams and companies to use these funds, you can see some at California Climate Investments homepage. Recently, CleanStart had presenters from California Air Resources Board (CARB), The Grant Farm, and Terzo Power Systems talk about the process and potential of using grants to finance a startup.

 

Attendees learned that through AB 32 over $1.6 billion had been allocated to fight global climate change. Ryan Huft, an engineer at CARB, outlined all of the agencies receiving funding available for 2018 and 2019. He shared California Climate Investments  as the location of many opportunities. These investments support a variety of state interest but all have common goals: supporting the reduction of greenhouse gases, helping underserved and disadvantaged communities, and helping all of California take the lead in creating a sustainable future. Ethan Hanohano shared his and The Grant Farm’s considerable experience in forming partnerships to win grants and how companies should approach the grants. He recommended starting by building a solid team, creating a purpose, and connecting with grants that are in your companies field.

All the speakers emphasized two things: write exactly what the grant says it wants and connect with disadvantaged communities. Huft’s and Hanohano’s presentations kept going back to one major point, “Grants explicitly lay out what they want. Have your proposal follow that.” There may seem like there is duplication in grants, but everything is there for a reason. So even if you have said it before, say it the same way again. It is important to keep it simple and connect to each requirement.

Connecting with disadvantaged or underserved communities is important and is a good practice for any growing company. Connecting can mean creating jobs, improving quality of life, or connecting a community to more resources. When creating a clean tech or sustainable solution, understanding connections and benefits to communities is not only important for grants but also the general company development. These communities are potentially future customers and partners in new tech development.

Mike Terzo of Terzo Power Systems won $4 million in CEC grants in 2016. He took the application and wrote exactly to it. Terzo is now working on those grants and learning a few extra lessons along the way. The big one was giving yourself time and flexibility to reach milestones and deliverables. Setting a realistic timeline is more important then setting an aggressive one. Realistic time management is important in controlling your business and connecting with investors. With grants it is no exception. Agencies administering the grants have goals they want you to achieve; make sure a proposal has a reasonable timeline for you to do that.

Terzo highlighted understanding a grants reimbursement and your incurred liabilities is important while building a successful grant proposal. Grants pay in arrears, meaning you are reimbursed for costs you have already paid. Vendors, contractors, employees and leases may be due before you receive reimbursement. You will need a way to finance the time difference between incurring the cost, invoicing the agency, and getting a check. It would be common for the grant reimbursement cycle to take 4-5 months. You likely will need a bank, an SBA loan guarantee or alternative financing to make a grant workable for you.

All of the work done for a grant not only benefits a startup if they get the grant, but also pushes them to better understand how their technology connects to the larger ecosystem and how they can be effectively managed. Actively applying for grants can have more benefits than funding for a company.

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Thomas is the Executive Director of CleanStart. Thomas has a strong background in supporting small businesses, leadership, financial management and is proficient in working with nonprofits. He has a BS in Finance and a BA in Economics from California State University, Chico. Thomas has a passion for sustainability and a commitment to supporting non-profits in the region.

Sponsors

SMUD
CMC
RiverCity Bank

Weintraub | Tobin, Revrnt, Moss Adams, PowerSoft.biz, Greenberg Traurig

Brookings – “Cleantech venture capital: Continued declines and narrow geography limit prospects”

Brookings – “Cleantech venture capital: Continued declines and narrow geography limit prospects”

The Brookings Institution has published a  review of VC investment into clean tech with some interesting conclusions.  As we have said before, venture capital may not be a very good source of start up money in the clean tech sector.  This report shows in detail how the investments have declined.  The good news is that $5 billion is still being invested per year, but it is concentrated in only a few geographies.  Corporate venture funds are also showing renewed interest.

Cleantech Venture Capital: Continued declines and narrow geography limit prospects

If you are looking for more effective ways to raise money for a startup, sign up for our June 20 class on crowdfunding.  This is a disruptive “technology” for finding capital, with great promise but also some pitfalls.  The class is the most comprehensive explanation of what crowdfunding can do for you.  Don’t miss it.