CleanTech Showcase 2022

CleanTech Showcase 2022

INNOVATIONS TO DRIVE CARBON-FREE POWER

Join industry experts and startups as we explore and showcase the innovations in our region that will drive our carbon-free power future.
[raw]


[/raw]

During this free half-day event, the showcase will feature and spotlight startups, innovators, and industry experts through talks and panels exploring the need for a carbon-free future, opportunities, the current state of climate tech, utility supply and customer demand.

Date: April 12, 2022, 9:00am – 12:00pm

[raw]




[/raw]

Evolution of the Grid and Renewables Policy in California

Evolution of the Grid and Renewables Policy in California

Nick Pappas, founder of NP Energy and our Perspectives presenter on January 27, is something like a midwife.  He found that his best skill was in helping clients ease the transition to a renewable energy system by explaining the pains involved, how to deal with them, how to avoid some of them, and keeping the benefits of the end point in mind.  In doing so, he is very good at highlighting upcoming opportunities and at warning of where risks need to be avoided.  It is not a good idea to ignore his insights.

He is passionate about smoothing this transition and demonstrating how it can be successfully adopted elsewhere.  As he says, he wants to make good, workable climate policy “California’s #1 Export” and building the blueprint for others to follow so that there is maximum contribution to avoiding serious climate change.  California’s big deregulation move in the 1990s was not done well and led to the extreme price swings and rolling blackouts of the early 2000s.  California became the big negative example.  Nick wants to see there is not a repeat of that.

We covered a lot of ground in our 30 minutes with him.  Here are some of the highlights we got out of his talk (with apologies to Nick for embellishing some of this points).

  • Reliability of the grid is a complex challenge, and our understanding of grid reliability and planning is evolving over time. How do we successfully orchestrate the transition to clean energy?
  • There is a “storage revolution” coming.  For the first time in the coming summer and the next, there will be enough big storage projects on line (over 2000 MW of grid-level storage in 2022 and 5000 MW in 2023) to test how Cal ISO will be able to integrate storage into the dispatch and how the pricing of the energy from it will work out.  We will probably be surprised.
  • At the same time, there will be a lot of retirements of conventional generation in the next three years, especially of the 2.2 GW at the Diablo Canyon nuclear units.  Managing a retirement of that scale could pose a lot of operational issues, and we need to get ahead of that problem before it becomes a blot on the transition.  
  • Overbuilding solar and wind resources can make a serious dent in electric sector emissions, but overbuilding alone will not be sufficientto fully decarbonize the grid. We need creativity and innovation on our pathway to 2045.
  • There is much more opportunity in “flexing” loads to match demand to supply than is being exploited.  It may be much cheaper to do that than to attempt to solve renewable integration solely throughthe 15,000+ MW of storage now contemplated in the latest CPUC view of what investments in power sources are needed in the next 10 years. Demand flexibility will supplement that storage and provide more operational flexibility.   However, human behavior remains a major barrier to load flex capability that is being tried now.  In the future, consumers may not be able to override the flex signals from the utility as they do now.  In any case, it may deserve a more intensive effort to utilize than it is getting now. How will the “flex” be done in a way consumers won’t care and is better than calls for voluntary shut offs?  
  • The growth in the number of EV chargers and electric heat pumps (as a part of replacing gas appliances with electric alternatives) could provide the best option for creating a critical mass of flexible load, unless we miss that opportunity.  How do we make the addition of the flex feature easy and worthwhile?
  • The additions of more renewable sources and more storage can help drive down the cost of these resources through innovation and economies of scale. We should expect prices to continue to fall, especially, for storage, though supply chain, resources, and development have significant potential to increase costs and cause delays.
  • The storage being added will resolve the daily mismatch between demand and supply, but the seasonal gap—the need to move excess generation from Spring to Fall—is much harder to address.  Building big, high capital cost battery storage to be used at a very low capacity factor may not be an acceptable solution.  Innovative ways to use chemical storage, such as hydrogen, to decarbonize the existing combustion fleet may help address these rare peak events.
  • Decarbonizing electricity is important, but we should not forget the opportunity cost of much lower-hanging fruit in the transportation, building, and industrial sectors where there may be better bang for the buck, more CO2 reductions per dollar, than continuing to work only on the electricity sector.  It is a bit harder to see how incentives or limitations could be applied in these other sectors, but it is worthwhile to figure it out and to innovate approaches that work in a competitive economy.
  • The value of rooftop solar to the building owner is likely to decline.  Even if the CPUC’s proposed decision on net metering is further moderated this time, it will not be the end of this debate, but the trend will be for compensation to be more closely aligned with value. Ensuring these systems provide value – particularly how storage is dispatched on the grid – may mitigate this risk.

It was a lively session and you can watch the entire recording of it below.  Nick had so much to say we are going to invite him back to continue this discussion. 

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gary Simon is the Chair of CleanStart’s Board. A seasoned energy executive and entrepreneur with 45 years of experience in business, government, and non-profits.

CleanStart Sponsors

Weintraub | TobinBlueTech Valley, Revrnt, 

Moss AdamsPowerSoft.biz, Greenberg Traurig, Momentum,

College of Engineering & Computer Science at Sacramento State

CleanTech Meetup: Energy Storage

CleanTech Meetup: Energy Storage

[raw]


[/raw]

Activity in Microgrids

Activity in Microgrids

Microgrids continue to be a hot topic in California.  Three recent articles provide some perspective on the current state of play.  Two of the articles discuss concerns people have with the evolving rules in California, calling them too restrictive.  A third article reports on the action by a Wisconsin utility to install and own 30 MW of microgrids in its territory in 22 projects.  Interesting approach, but unlikely to be a path followed in California, even though the utilities would probably benefit from doing so.

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gary Simon is the Chair of CleanStarts Board. A seasoned energy executive and entrepreneur with 45 years of experience in business, government, and non-profits.

CleanStart Sponsors

Weintraub | Tobin, EYBlueTech Valley, Revrnt, Moss Adams, PowerSoft.biz, Greenberg Traurig

Momentum, College of Engineering & Computer Science at Sacramento State

New Horizons in the Relationship Between Ratepayers and the Utility

New Horizons in the Relationship Between Ratepayers and the Utility

If you were ever curious about the new ways utilities may be relating to their customers now and in the future, a great way to get a quick introduction is to watch the video of this outstanding discussion on the topic we did on December 3.  It was probably the most informative MeetUp we have had, and one of the most popular with 46 people attending.  If you missed it, you can view the recording on our YouTube Channel and below.

We had three outstanding speakers.  Dr. Karen Herter started things off by reviewing her experiments on getting amazing demand reductions using clever communications technology and instantaneous information on the changing prices of electricity.  She had done one experiment piggybacking a signal on  the FM broadcast of local Capital Radio.  Another used a small in-home receiver.  But that was a minor part of what she found out.  She had customers use a number of interactive thermostats and pre-cooling settings to see what those customers considered the best combination of features and ease of use.  With the best system there were astonishing cost savings and demand reduction, far more than Time of Day rates had achieved.  She is on loan to the CEC to help them devise the best strategies for applying her work.  The key she indicated was getting a much better database of rates and communication protocols with standardization so that more vendors of energy-saving equipment can rely on that information to control their devices.

Tanya Barham of the Community Energy Lab in Oregon talked about her experience, borne out of various companies she had worked for previously, in finding simple systems to apply AI control to reduce energy use and costs in schools, churches and municipal buildings.  She sees this expanding to become part of the strategy for decarbonizing buildings.  She agreed that the kind of database work Dr. Herter was doing was absolutely essential to provide wider applications of user-based demand reductions.  In her work, she was seeing a two-month payback on investments made in simple software systems and sensors to manage building energy use.  

Ryan Braas of SMUD introduced us to the SMUD Energy Store, an initiative that is showing great results in getting energy-saving devices in the hands of users through an online store.  SMUD is continuing to expand its offerings on the Store site, but one of the most popular features, Ryan said, was the “Instant Rebate”.  While utilities across the country offer rebates to customers purchasing various energy-saving devices, often a great deal of paperwork and wait time is needed to actually get the money—fill out a form, mail it in with a copy of the receipt for the device and a copy of a recent bill to verify one is a customer of the utility, wait for the request to be entered into the system at the utility and 30-60 day later a check arrives in the mail.  With the Energy Store, the rebate is taken immediately and deducted from the price of the device.  The user is already verified as a customer and the proof of purchase is inherent as a part of the process.  So bingo no wait, no extra paperwork.  This is a great example of a utility establishing an entirely new relationship with its customers, one the customers end up valuing highly.  If you are SMUD customer and haven’t visited the Energy Store you should.  Go the the Smud.org site and find it.

The three presentations were followed by a lively Q&A, and more importantly, the audience used the Chat Room function to ask questions and get answers there as well.  This is really becoming a very useful way to inform our cleantech community.  If you haven’t attended one of these monthly sessions, you really should.  We clearly are getting people far from our home territory participating, and that is making it all the better.

Thomas Hall

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gary Simon is the Chair of CleanStarts Board. A seasoned energy executive and entrepreneur with 45 years of experience in business, government, and non-profits.

CleanStart Sponsors

Weintraub | Tobin, EYBlueTech Valley, Revrnt, Moss Adams, PowerSoft.biz

Momentum, College of Engineering & Computer Science at Sacramento State